<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debian Adopts Two-Year Time-Based Release Cycle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/30/debian-adopts-two-year-time-based-release-cycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/30/debian-adopts-two-year-time-based-release-cycle/</link>
	<description>All the news you need about Debian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 18:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Benko</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/30/debian-adopts-two-year-time-based-release-cycle/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Benko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5874#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a bit ambivalent about this change that the Debian team has decided to make.

My ultimate choice of using Debian was heavily influenced by the non-rigid release cycle.
I would hope that the Debian team doesn&#039;t fall into the trap of forcing new functionality into the stable release before it had been properly tested, as some GNU+Linux distributions seem to have done, repeatedly, in the past.

However, this change doesn&#039;t really affect me too much, as my home desktop systems are running under the testing/unstable branches of Debian. I am, however, concerned about the possibility this may affect the stability of the stable branch on the servers I run, as well as my wife&#039;s Debian installs (she stick with the stable branch).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bit ambivalent about this change that the Debian team has decided to make.</p>
<p>My ultimate choice of using Debian was heavily influenced by the non-rigid release cycle.<br />
I would hope that the Debian team doesn&#8217;t fall into the trap of forcing new functionality into the stable release before it had been properly tested, as some GNU+Linux distributions seem to have done, repeatedly, in the past.</p>
<p>However, this change doesn&#8217;t really affect me too much, as my home desktop systems are running under the testing/unstable branches of Debian. I am, however, concerned about the possibility this may affect the stability of the stable branch on the servers I run, as well as my wife&#8217;s Debian installs (she stick with the stable branch).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using n/a (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 15/22 queries in 0.075 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.debian-news.net @ 2013-06-20 01:06:39 by W3 Total Cache -->