<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zacchiroli: working with FSF on Debian Free-ness assessment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debian-news.net/2012/07/06/zacchiroli-working-with-fsf-on-debian-free-ness-assessment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2012/07/06/zacchiroli-working-with-fsf-on-debian-free-ness-assessment/</link>
	<description>All the news you need about Debian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shankar</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2012/07/06/zacchiroli-working-with-fsf-on-debian-free-ness-assessment/comment-page-1/#comment-8588</link>
		<dc:creator>Shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 04:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=9681#comment-8588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree.  Please don&#039;t cripple Debian for most users by eliminating non-free repositories entirely.  The current Debian approach strikes me as the correct one, with the right combination of flexibility and freeness.  The FSF approach will make the system unusable for a very large number of people - particularly those who, like me, live in parts of India or other countries where a wide range of hardware is simply not accessible.  The FSF&#039;s position does not take into account ground realities and there&#039;s no reason for Debian to stick to its stipulations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  Please don&#8217;t cripple Debian for most users by eliminating non-free repositories entirely.  The current Debian approach strikes me as the correct one, with the right combination of flexibility and freeness.  The FSF approach will make the system unusable for a very large number of people &#8211; particularly those who, like me, live in parts of India or other countries where a wide range of hardware is simply not accessible.  The FSF&#8217;s position does not take into account ground realities and there&#8217;s no reason for Debian to stick to its stipulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R S Chakravarti</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2012/07/06/zacchiroli-working-with-fsf-on-debian-free-ness-assessment/comment-page-1/#comment-8577</link>
		<dc:creator>R S Chakravarti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=9681#comment-8577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe non-free and contrib could be moved to a site outside of Debian. But there should be some exceptions such as firmware-linux-nonfree which a lot of people need. I think it is more important to help them use Debian than to satisfy FSF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe non-free and contrib could be moved to a site outside of Debian. But there should be some exceptions such as firmware-linux-nonfree which a lot of people need. I think it is more important to help them use Debian than to satisfy FSF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using n/a (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 16/23 queries in 0.038 seconds using disk: basic

 Served from: www.debian-news.net @ 2013-05-23 01:40:23 by W3 Total Cache -->