<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Debian-News.net - Your one stop for news about Debian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debian-news.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debian-news.net</link>
	<description>All the news you need about Debian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:43:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sysvinit vs. Upstart: Boot Performance for Debian and Ubuntu</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/sysvinit-vs-upstart-boot-performance-for-debian-and-ubuntu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/sysvinit-vs-upstart-boot-performance-for-debian-and-ubuntu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Developers from Debian and Ubuntu met and discussed ways to improve boot performance at Canonical’s London headquarters.  More here
The Ubuntu project would like to completely implement Upstart for version 10.04 with the first changes appearing on version 9.10. The question is whether the Debian project will follow suit. Debian developer Petter Reinholdtsen was not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Developers from Debian and Ubuntu met and discussed ways to improve boot performance at Canonical’s London headquarters. <span id="more-5753"></span> More <a href="http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/Sysvinit-vs.-Upstart-Boot-Performance-for-Debian-and-Ubuntu">here</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The Ubuntu project would like to completely implement Upstart for version 10.04 with the first changes appearing on version 9.10. The question is whether the Debian project will follow suit. Debian developer Petter Reinholdtsen was not without reservations regarding this move which lead to discussion on how the transition could be made as convenient and simple as possible. In addition to the required code updates, a continuous cooperation to extend beyond the conference in has been proposed. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/sysvinit-vs-upstart-boot-performance-for-debian-and-ubuntu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How-To: Install FrostWire 4.18.0 in Debian Lenny</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/how-to-install-frostwire-4-18-0-in-debian-lenny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/how-to-install-frostwire-4-18-0-in-debian-lenny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrostWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FrostWire is an open-source, free Java-based peer-to-peer client with support for the BitTorrent protocol, skins and iTunes. The latest release, 4.18.0, contains many improvements, bug fixes and several changes. More here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FrostWire is an open-source, free Java-based peer-to-peer client with support for the BitTorrent protocol, skins and iTunes. The latest release, 4.18.0, contains many improvements, bug fixes and several changes.<span id="more-5751"></span> More <a href="http://tuxarena.blogspot.com/2009/07/how-to-install-frostwire-4180-in-debian.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/how-to-install-frostwire-4-18-0-in-debian-lenny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debian plans draw sharp warning from GNU guru</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/debian-plans-draw-sharp-warning-from-gnu-guru/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/debian-plans-draw-sharp-warning-from-gnu-guru/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mono]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Debian project releases a second update of its Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (&#8221;Lenny&#8221;) distribution, a controversy has broken out over the next version, &#8220;Squeeze.&#8221; GNU guru Richard Stallman has warned that by including a Mono-based note-taking application called Tomboy, Debian runs the risk of Microsoft litigation over C# patents. More here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Debian project releases a second update of its Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 (&#8221;Lenny&#8221;) distribution, a controversy has broken out over the next version, &#8220;Squeeze.&#8221; GNU guru Richard Stallman has warned that by including a Mono-based note-taking application called Tomboy, Debian runs the risk of Microsoft litigation over C# patents.<span id="more-5749"></span> More <a href="http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS4526886823.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/02/debian-plans-draw-sharp-warning-from-gnu-guru/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Custom Linux Firewalls with Debian</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/custom-linux-firewalls-with-debian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/custom-linux-firewalls-with-debian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In this tutorial we&#8217;ll cover many topics that will allow you to build your own custom firewall machine from scratch using standard PC hardware and the Linux operating system. I&#8217;ll present everything from the basic topics of firewalls, DHCP, and DNS, up to advanced features such as VPN and IDS. More here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In this tutorial we&#8217;ll cover many topics that will allow you to build your own custom firewall machine from scratch using standard PC hardware and the Linux operating system. I&#8217;ll present everything from the basic topics of firewalls, DHCP, and DNS, up to advanced features such as VPN and IDS.<span id="more-5747"></span> More <a href="http://www.cyberdogtech.com/firewalls/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/custom-linux-firewalls-with-debian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flexbackup On Debian</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/flexbackup-on-debian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/flexbackup-on-debian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flexbackup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use flexbackup to run my tape backup and on the older Debian installation, flexbackup would correctly set the block size of the tape and run the backup.  On the latest installation, running flexbackup gave an error message&#8230; More here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use flexbackup to run my tape backup and on the older Debian installation, flexbackup would correctly set the block size of the tape and run the backup.  On the latest installation, running flexbackup gave an error message&#8230;<span id="more-5745"></span> More <a href="http://www.amindlost.co.uk/?p=339">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/flexbackup-on-debian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Okular, Debian, and copy restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/okular-debian-and-copy-restrictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/okular-debian-and-copy-restrictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Okular]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hus, free applications do not normally implement &#8220;features&#8221; which allow their users to do less. One might think that the consensus against &#8220;antifeatures&#8221; in free software is nearly universal, but, as the case of the okular PDF reader in Debian shows, there are still exceptions.  More here
This is not the case with Okular, though. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hus, free applications do not normally implement &#8220;features&#8221; which allow their users to do less. One might think that the consensus against &#8220;antifeatures&#8221; in free software is nearly universal, but, as the case of the okular PDF reader in Debian shows, there are still exceptions. <span id="more-5743"></span> More <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/335415/">here</a></p>
<blockquote><p>This is not the case with Okular, though. An attempt to select text from a suitably-marked PDF file yields a rather confusing dialog which reads &#8220;copy forbidden by DRM&#8221; (see the image to the right). Amusingly, the application will still allow the selected region to be saved as an image file, but sending the text to the clipboard is not allowed. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/okular-debian-and-copy-restrictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GNBD on Debian installation howto</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/gnbd-on-debian-installation-howto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/gnbd-on-debian-installation-howto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GNBD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GNBD is some kind of alternative to iSCSI and to a lower extent to sshfs or other filesharing system (NFS, Samba, etc.). Unlike iSCSI, there’s no authentication or such, I invite you to read the documentation to learn more about GNBD. Read it here
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GNBD is some kind of alternative to iSCSI and to a lower extent to sshfs or other filesharing system (NFS, Samba, etc.). Unlike iSCSI, there’s no authentication or such, I invite you to read the documentation to learn more about GNBD.<span id="more-5739"></span> Read it <a href="http://www.wains.be/index.php/2009/06/30/gnbd-on-debian-installation-howto/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/07/01/gnbd-on-debian-installation-howto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to install portable Damn Small Linux in USB drive?</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/how-to-install-portable-damn-small-linux-in-usb-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/how-to-install-portable-damn-small-linux-in-usb-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Damn Small Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn Small Linux, as its name says, is an extremely small linux distribution.It will take around 51MB disk space.We can port the DSL just like that in a pen drive.Also we can store the worked files in the usb pen drive itself. It is just like we have a fuly installed computer in hand in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn Small Linux, as its name says, is an extremely small linux distribution.It will take around 51MB disk space.We can port the DSL just like that in a pen drive.Also we can store the worked files in the usb pen drive itself. It is just like we have a fuly installed computer in hand in a usb flash device. <span id="more-5737"></span> More <a href="http://electronicerror.blogspot.com/2009/06/how-to-install-portable-damn-small.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/how-to-install-portable-damn-small-linux-in-usb-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debian Lenny on an old Dell Inspiron 1505E</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/debian-lenny-on-an-old-dell-inspiron-1505e/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/debian-lenny-on-an-old-dell-inspiron-1505e/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the laptop finally showing its age I decided to go with Debian, first Etch but soon enough Lenny was released so I upgraded to it and installing some additional software and such.  More here
A couple of months back I was having some trouble with Ubuntu Hardy on my old Dell Inspiron 1505E laptop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the laptop finally showing its age I decided to go with Debian, first Etch but soon enough Lenny was released so I upgraded to it and installing some additional software and such. <span id="more-5735"></span> More <a href="http://noobtolinux.blogspot.com/2009/06/debian-lenny-on-old-dell-inspiron-1505e.html">here</a></p>
<blockquote><p>A couple of months back I was having some trouble with Ubuntu Hardy on my old Dell Inspiron 1505E laptop in terms of performance. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/debian-lenny-on-an-old-dell-inspiron-1505e/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xubuntu 9.04 vs Debian 5.0.1 Xfce</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/xubuntu-9-04-vs-debian-5-0-1-xfce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/xubuntu-9-04-vs-debian-5-0-1-xfce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xfce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=5733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Instead of a review of what everyone already knows, this week I thought we&#8217;d take a look at how the newly released Xubuntu 9.04 compares to Debian Lenny with an Xfce desktop. More here
While some may be touting that Debian is obsolete now that Ubuntu rules the roost, I have to whole-heartedly disagree. Debian [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Instead of a review of what everyone already knows, this week I thought we&#8217;d take a look at how the newly released Xubuntu 9.04 compares to Debian Lenny with an Xfce desktop.<span id="more-5733"></span> More <a href="http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090427#feature">here</a></p>
<blockquote><p>While some may be touting that Debian is obsolete now that Ubuntu rules the roost, I have to whole-heartedly disagree. Debian provides a solid, stable environment that you can really trust and rely on. Ubuntu, on the other hand, appears to have put more priority on a timely release over stability and, as a result, seem to rush out half-baked releases. There&#8217;s nothing that Ubuntu can do that Debian can&#8217;t &#8211; it&#8217;s just a matter of how simple that task is.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2009/06/30/xubuntu-9-04-vs-debian-5-0-1-xfce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.253 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-07-03 00:55:01 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->