<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Debian-News.net - Your one stop for news about Debian &#187; Kernel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.debian-news.net/tag/kernel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.debian-news.net</link>
	<description>All the news you need about Debian</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Linux 3.2 in wheezy</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2012/01/31/linux-3-2-in-wheezy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2012/01/31/linux-3-2-in-wheezy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheezy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=9274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Debian 7.0 &#8216;wheezy&#8217; will include Linux 3.2. This is currently in unstable and will soon enter testing. The kernel team is open to backporting some features from later kernel versions, particularly to support newer hardware. Featuresets &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; The only featureset provided will be &#8216;rt&#8217; (realtime), currently built for amd64 only. If there is interest in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debian 7.0 &#8216;wheezy&#8217; will include Linux 3.2.  This is currently in unstable and will soon enter testing.<span id="more-9274"></span></p>
<p>The kernel team is open to backporting some features from later kernel<br />
versions, particularly to support newer hardware.</p>
<p>Featuresets<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>The only featureset provided will be &#8216;rt&#8217; (realtime), currently built<br />
for amd64 only.  If there is interest in realtime support for other<br />
architectures, we may be able to add that.  However, we do need to<br />
consider the total time taken to build binary packages for each<br />
architecture.</p>
<p>If there are particular container features that should be enabled or<br />
backported to provide a useful replacement for OpenVZ or VServer,<br />
please let us know.  We cannot promise that these will all be enabled<br />
but we need to know what is missing.</p>
<p>Compatibility<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>If you maintain a package for which the current stable version is not<br />
compatible with Linux 3.2, excluding kernel module packages, please<br />
consider making a stable update that fixes this.</p>
<p>If you maintain a kernel module package, please ensure that this is<br />
compatible with Linux 3.2 in time for the freeze.  Any modules that<br />
are not compatible will not be included in the release.  I recently<br />
tested building all the module packages I could find against Linux 3.1<br />
and have filed bugs against those that failed to build; however I have<br />
not tested against Linux 3.2 and would prefer that the respective<br />
maintainers did so.</p>
<p>We intend to switch to 2-component upstream version numbers in the<br />
kernel version string, e.g.  3.3-1-amd64.  This change has been<br />
deferred until after wheezy to avoid incompatibility with packages in<br />
squeeze that assume 3-component version numbers.  If your package uses<br />
uname(1) or uname(2) please ensure that it is prepared for this *in<br />
wheezy* so that we can make the change immediately after.</p>
<p>Upstream support<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Debian, Ubuntu and others will work upstream on a 3.2.y longterm<br />
series of bug fixes.</p>
<p>Ben.</p>
<p>&#8211; Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. &#8211; Albert Camus </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2012/01/31/linux-3-2-in-wheezy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debian Wheezy Moving To Linux 3.0</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2011/06/06/debian-wheezy-moving-to-linux-3-0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2011/06/06/debian-wheezy-moving-to-linux-3-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheezy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=8615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Linux 3.0 on its way, the Debian developers have decided to move the Debian Wheezy development from Linux 2.6 to Linux 3.0. More here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Linux 3.0 on its way, the Debian developers have decided to move the Debian Wheezy development from Linux 2.6 to Linux 3.0.<span id="more-8615"></span> More <a href="http://techie-buzz.com/foss/debian-wheezy-linux-3-0.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2011/06/06/debian-wheezy-moving-to-linux-3-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Custom Kernels on Debian</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2011/02/04/custom-kernels-on-debian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2011/02/04/custom-kernels-on-debian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=8187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven’t bothered with custom kernels in a long time. I think the last time I ran a custom kernel on my own machine was in 2006. There was a time where I would just read kernel code and change random things just to see what would happen, I’m definitely not that brave anymore. More [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven’t bothered with custom kernels in a long time. I think the last time I ran a custom kernel on my own machine was in 2006. There was a time where I would just read kernel code and change random things just to see what would happen, I’m definitely not that brave anymore.<span id="more-8187"></span> More <a href="http://jonathancarter.org/2011/02/03/custom-kernels-on-debian/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2011/02/04/custom-kernels-on-debian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debian 6.0 &#8220;Squeeze&#8221; to be released with complete free Linux kernel</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/12/15/debian-6-0-squeeze-to-be-released-with-complete-free-linux-kernel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/12/15/debian-6-0-squeeze-to-be-released-with-complete-free-linux-kernel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[release]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=8031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Debian project has been working in removing non-free firmware from the Linux kernel shipped with Debian for the past two release cycles. At the time of the releases of Debian 4.0 &#8220;Etch&#8221; [1] and 5.0 &#8220;Lenny&#8221; [2], however, it was not yet possible to ship Linux kernels stripped of all non-free firmware bits. Back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Debian project has been working in removing non-free firmware from the Linux kernel shipped with Debian for the past two release cycles.  At the time of the releases of Debian 4.0 &#8220;Etch&#8221; [1] and 5.0 &#8220;Lenny&#8221; [2], however, it was not yet possible to ship Linux kernels stripped of all non-free firmware bits.  Back then we had to acknowledge that freedom issues concerning Linux firmware were not completely sorted out [3][4].<span id="more-8031"></span></p>
<p>  1: http://www.debian.org/releases/etch/<br />
  2: http://www.debian.org/releases/lenny/<br />
  3: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_007<br />
  4: http://www.debian.org/vote/2008/vote_003</p>
<p>We have nonetheless kept on working on splitting away non-free bits from<br />
the Linux kernel, thanks to the work of the Debian Kernel team [5] and<br />
various Linux upstream developers. We are proud to announce that, to the<br />
best of our knowledge, all issues are solved and that we will be able to<br />
deliver a Linux kernel which is completely Free, according to the Debian<br />
Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) [6], with Debian Squeeze. We hereby<br />
reaffirm Free Software as one of our priorities, as documented in the<br />
Debian Social Contract [7].</p>
<p>  5: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel<br />
  6: http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines<br />
  7: http://www.debian.org/social_contract</p>
<p>In accordance with the Debian Social Contract, we acknowledge that some<br />
users require the use of works that do not conform to the DFSG and that<br />
those works might include non-free firmware bits. For the time being, we<br />
have added to the &#8220;non-free&#8221; area of our archives alternative installation<br />
images and additional packages for Debian Squeeze, that include non-free<br />
firmware bits needed to enable specific pieces of hardware. They are not<br />
part of Debian, they should be looked for explicitly by interested users,<br />
and we cannot support them to the same extent of Free firmware as we do not<br />
have access to the corresponding source code. We encourage hardware<br />
manufacturers to release only DFSG-free firmware and we cannot accept other<br />
kind of firmware as part of Debian.</p>
<p>About Debian<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The Debian Project was founded in 1993 by Ian Murdock to be a truly<br />
free, community project. Since then the project has grown to be one of<br />
the largest and most influential open source projects.  Over three<br />
thousand volunteers from all over the world work together to create and<br />
maintain Debian software. Translated into over 65 languages, and<br />
supporting a huge range of computer types, Debian calls itself the<br />
&#8220;universal operating system&#8221;.</p>
<p>Contact Information<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>For further information, please visit the Debian web pages at<br />
http://www.debian.org/ or send mail to
<press@debian.org>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/12/15/debian-6-0-squeeze-to-be-released-with-complete-free-linux-kernel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Update the Debian Lenny Kernel</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/12/12/how-to-update-the-debian-lenny-kernel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/12/12/how-to-update-the-debian-lenny-kernel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=8010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Debian is a version of Linux established in 1993. It has three distinct release branches: stable, testing and unstable. Debian &#8220;Lenny&#8221; was released on November 27, 2010, and is the current stable distribution as of 2010. Updating the kernel in Debian is accomplished through the built-in &#8220;apt-get&#8221; update system. More here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debian is a version of Linux established in 1993. It has three distinct release branches: stable, testing and unstable. Debian &#8220;Lenny&#8221; was released on November 27, 2010, and is the current stable distribution as of 2010. Updating the kernel in Debian is accomplished through the built-in &#8220;apt-get&#8221; update system.<span id="more-8010"></span> More <a href="http://www.ehow.com/how_7626946_update-debian-lenny-kernel.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/12/12/how-to-update-the-debian-lenny-kernel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 233-Line Kernel Patch and the (Even Easier) Alternatives</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/11/29/the-233-line-kernel-patch-and-the-even-easier-alternatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/11/29/the-233-line-kernel-patch-and-the-even-easier-alternatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=7960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate over the two original approaches &#8220;shows the division in the Linux camp,&#8221; said Slashdot blogger hairyfeet. &#8220;On one side you have the DIYers with the patch; on the other, the &#8216;make it easy&#8217; option with an update that will end up rolled in the kernel. &#8220;Who is right? Well, I still say that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate over the two original approaches &#8220;shows the division in the Linux camp,&#8221; said Slashdot blogger hairyfeet. &#8220;On one side you have the DIYers with the patch; on the other, the &#8216;make it easy&#8217; option with an update that will end up rolled in the kernel. &#8220;Who is right? Well, I still say that Linux needs to be looking at Apple and MSFT on the usability standpoint, so I&#8217;d go with the easier option.&#8221;<span id="more-7960"></span> More <a href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/The-233-Line-Kernel-Patch-and-the-Even-Easier-Alternatives-71328.html">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/11/29/the-233-line-kernel-patch-and-the-even-easier-alternatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using pv-grub to run custom kernels on Debian</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/10/28/using-pv-grub-to-run-custom-kernels-on-debian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/10/28/using-pv-grub-to-run-custom-kernels-on-debian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=7814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just installing the kernel in the first article hasn&#8217;t changed anything about how your Debian VPS will boot. We&#8217;ll need to make some other changes before pv-grub will boot with the new kernel. More here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just installing the kernel in the first article hasn&#8217;t changed anything about how your Debian VPS will boot. We&#8217;ll need to make some other changes before pv-grub will boot with the new kernel.<span id="more-7814"></span> More <a href="http://articles.slicehost.com/2010/10/27/using-pv-grub-to-run-custom-kernels-on-debian-enabling-and-troubleshooting">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/10/28/using-pv-grub-to-run-custom-kernels-on-debian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automatically remove old kernels from Debian-based distributions</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/06/19/automatically-remove-old-kernels-from-debian-based-distributions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/06/19/automatically-remove-old-kernels-from-debian-based-distributions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=7215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[apt-get doesn’t clean old kernels, as it may screw up and render the system unbootable. However, leaving a lot of kernels in /boot often results in filling up the space. This is especially true of /boot is in a little partition on its own. More here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apt-get doesn’t clean old kernels, as it may screw up and render the system unbootable. However, leaving a lot of kernels in /boot often results in filling up the space. This is especially true of /boot is in a little partition on its own. <span id="more-7215"></span> More <a href="http://stoilis.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/automatically-remove-old-kernels-from-debian-based-distributions/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/06/19/automatically-remove-old-kernels-from-debian-based-distributions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building Linux kernels the Debian way</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/06/09/building-linux-kernels-the-debian-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/06/09/building-linux-kernels-the-debian-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=7186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First we will install all prerequisites then download kernel source. Next step will be customization and as a last step we will create a Debian package with new Customized Linux kernel and install it. More here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First we will install all prerequisites then download kernel source. Next step will be customization and as a last step we will create a Debian package with new Customized Linux kernel and install it.<span id="more-7186"></span> More <a href="http://www.linuxconfig.org/building-kernels-the-debian-way">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/06/09/building-linux-kernels-the-debian-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debian (and Ubuntu, etc) Kernels for the Acer Aspire One</title>
		<link>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/01/06/debian-and-ubuntu-etc-kernels-for-the-acer-aspire-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/01/06/debian-and-ubuntu-etc-kernels-for-the-acer-aspire-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cj2003</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debian Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kernel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.debian-news.net/?p=6585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I wrote about a couple days ago, I’m now the not-so-proud owner of an Aspire One, running Debian. (I love Debian; I kind of hate the Aspire One.) More here The current (January 2009) kernels distributed by Debian don’t quite support the full functionality of the Aspire One &#8211; one of the biggest issues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I wrote about a couple days ago, I’m now the not-so-proud owner of an Aspire One, running Debian. (I love Debian; I kind of hate the Aspire One.)<span id="more-6585"></span> More <a href="http://www.slugsite.com/archives/1268">here</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The current (January 2009) kernels distributed by Debian don’t quite support the full functionality of the Aspire One &#8211; one of the biggest issues is that the wifi won’t work. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.debian-news.net/2010/01/06/debian-and-ubuntu-etc-kernels-for-the-acer-aspire-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/15 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.debian-news.net @ 2012-02-09 01:31:44 -->
